VISHAL vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1810/2026 & CRL.M.A. 14632/2026 VISHAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Chawla, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with IO/SI Nishant. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case e-FIR No.80014479/2025 of PS Shaheen Bagh for offence under Section 310(2)/ 317(3)/61(2) BNS. 2. Broadly speaking, allegation of prosecution against the accused/applicant is that he tipped off the co-accused persons that two officials of the company in which he was working would be carrying cash BAIL APPLN.1810/2026 Page 1 of 4 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155709 96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.05.18 05:20:52 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:18.05.2026 17:46:45 amount of Rs. 25,31,000/-, after which the co-accused persons allegedly committed robbery of that amount and fled the spot. Further as per prosecution, the accused/applicant was apprehended and arrested with the help of technical surveillance and secret information. 3. Against the above backdrop, learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that it is the accused/applicant who had personally gone to the police station in compliance with the notice under Section 179 BNSS and he was arrested. It is also contended that there is no legally admissible evidence against the accused/applicant since even the al