Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

VIPIN KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 30449/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIPIN KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-30449-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 103 CRM-M-30449-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:26.05.2026 Vipin Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Harshit Joon, Advocate for the petitioner. ... Manisha Batra, J. (Oral). 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking benefit of anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR No.174, dated 17.09.2024, registered under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2008, at Police Station Cyber South, Gurugram. 2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a written complaint moved on behalf of the Zomato Limited, alleging that some unknown individuals had created and were operating fraudulent websites, email IDs and Instagram handles while impersonating the complainant company and using its registered trademark with intent to deceive the general public. It was alleged that those persons had been operating websites in the name of 'Zomato-liv.com' and other sites as while claiming to sell tickets of an event allegedly scheduled to take place at Jawahar Lal Ne