Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-08

VINOD vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 23976/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VINOD
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.23976 of 2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 CRM-M No.23976 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.05.2026 Vinod ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): This is first petition for bail, filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the ‘Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’. This petition pertains to a case arising out of FIR No.93 dated 03.06.2025 for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 and Section 25, 27, 59 of Arms Act, Police Station Bahu Akpurpur, District Rohtak. 2. The FIR of this case came into being at the instance of ‘Ravinder’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. It was stated stated by the above named complainant that on 03.06.2025 he along with his brother was irrigating his fields, and that at about 01.25 P.M. ‘Vinod’ (petitioner herein) came to the fields on scooty, armed with a farsa (chopper) and fire arm. As per complainant ‘Vinod’ fired a guns shot which hit ‘