Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

VINOD MAHTO vs MANISH WADHWA AND ANR

Citation / case number
FAO 3370/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VINOD MAHTO
Respondent
MANISH WADHWA AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (141) FAO-3370-2025 Date of decision: - 11.05.2026 Vinod Mahto ....Appellant Versus Manish Wadhwa and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Ms. Bhumika Khatri, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Sindher, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2-insurance company. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant is not aware about the fact that the present matter was referred to the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court and what has transpired in the mediation proceedings. It is prayed that the present appeal be disposed of but liberty be granted to revive the same after confirming all the said facts. 2. Disposed of, with the aforesaid liberty. ( VIKAS BAHL ) May 11, 2026 JUDGE naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2026.05.11 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement