Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

VINOD KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Citation / case number
CWP 13894/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VINOD KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-13894-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CWP-13894-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.05.2026 Vinod Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Brea Sandhu, Advocate for respondents No.3 to 5. HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to release the amount of revised 6th Pay Commission benefits of Gratuity, Leave Encashment and all other remaining benefits of the petitioner along with interest @ 18% for the delayed period, for which the representations dated 10.02.2026 and dated 18.03.2026 (Annexures P-4 and P-5, respectively) have been served by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the representations dated 10.02.2026 (Annexures P-4) and dated 18.03.2026 (Annexures P-5) submitted by the petitioner are decided by respondent No.3 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner.