Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-01

VINOD KUMAR AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

Citation / case number
CWP 17085/2015
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VINOD KUMAR AND ORS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-17085-2015 -1- 201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17085-2015 Date of decision : 01.05.2026 Vinod Kumar and others …….Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another ...….Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen S. Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners, even on second call. 2. On the last occasion also, i.e. on 21.04.2026, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Challenge in the present petition is to Rule 11 (bb) of the Haryana Superior Judicial Service Rules, 2007. 4. The said challenge has already been adjudicated upon and attained finality in a bunch of petitions, including CWP-27851-2023 titled ‘Rajender and others Vs. State of Haryana and another’, decided on 21.03.2024. The said decision was based upon an earlier decision rendered on 24.09.2019 in CWP-21026-2019 titled ‘Dr. Gurpuneet Singh Randhawa Vs. The Registrar General, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh’. NAROTAM DASS 2026.05.04 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of t