VINITA NAGPAL vs DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICE & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 21.05.2026 CONT.CAS(C) 838/2026 VINITA NAGPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Rai, Ms. Radhika Rai and Mr. Kalash Pandey, Advs. versus DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC and Mr. Nipun Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in terms of the judgment dated 16.09.2025, passed in W.P.(C) 14991/2024 (contempt of which is alleged in the present petition), the representation dated 15.10.2024 of the petitioner has been heard and disposed of by way of a reasoned order. A copy of the same is stated to have been sent to the petitioner as well. 2. Let a copy of the said decision be also supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In the circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. The same is accordingly, disposed of. 4. Needless to say, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the outcome of the representation, she shall be at liberty to avail remedies with regard thereto. SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 21, 2026/cl Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C)