VINAY SHARMA & ORS. vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 06.05.2026 CRL.M.C. 19/2025 & CRL.M.A. 92/2025 VINAY SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Counsel for petitioners (appearance not given) versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with IO/ASI Gurdeep Singh. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 350/2024 of PS Palam Village for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. State has no objection to this petition. CRL.M.C.19/2025 pages GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6 fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80 cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.05.06 05:29:20 -07'00' 3. The respondent no. 2 is present in the courtroom and identified by IO/ASI Gurdeep Singh. 4. Keeping in mind the nature of the issue, I have spoken with respondent no. 2 in Hindi and it is stated by