Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

VINAY KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 23808/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VINAY KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

272 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.23808 of 2026 Date of decision: 22.05.2026 Vinay Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Balraj Singh, Advocate and Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surinderjit S. Nahar, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.1-State. Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Singh Pundhir, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 482 Cr.P.C.) for quashing of FIR No.87 dated 14.07.2024 registered under Sections 308(4) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 (corresponding Sections 387 and 506 IPC) at Police Station Kotwali Bathinda, District Bathinda (Annexure P-1), with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.04.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. During the pendency of the dispute, the parties have compromised the matter and filed the present petition for quashing of FIR. 3. Vide order dated 30.04.2026, parties were directed to appear NEETU RANI 2026.05.22 17:06 I attest to the accu