Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

VIKAS vs STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 22748/2024
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIKAS
Respondent
STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 CWP-22748-2024 Date of Decision : May 07, 2026 VIKAS -PETITIONER V/S STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Ms. Maloo Chahal, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 21.06.2023 passed by the State Information Commission, Haryana, on the solitary ground that there was perversity in the recording of facts to the effect that the entire information sought by the petitioner had been received by him. 2. This Court specifically queried learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether any application had been filed before the State Information Commission in this regard, to which she fairly conceded in the negative. 3. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that the instant writ petition is not maintainable for the grievance raised. In the event of any grievance pertaining to the non-supply or inadequate supply of DEVINDER YADAV 2026.05.08 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authentici