Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

VIKAS MAKKAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 18238/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIKAS MAKKAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M No.18238 of 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 202 ***** CRM-M No.18238 of 2026 Date of decision : 21.5.2026 Date of uploading : 21.5.2026 Vikas Makkar ………….Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. R.S. Randhawa, Advocate, Mr. Ritesh Tomar, Advocate, for the petitioner Ms. Priyanka Sadar, Senior DAG, Haryana --- SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) 1. On 22.4.2026, the following order was passed: ‘Apprehending his arrest in FIR No. 233 dated 24.07.2025 under Sections 316(2) (406 IPC), 318(4) (420 IPC), 338 (467 IPC), 336(3) (406 IPC), 340, 61 (120A IPC), 351(2) (506 IPC), 3(5) (34 IPC) of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (Annexure P-1), registered at Police Station Kheripul, District Faridabad; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. Counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the genesis/backdrop of the FIR in question is a civil/property dispute, a somewhat similarly placed co-accused namely Dal Chand Tanwar @ D.C. Tanwar has been afforded the concession of anticipatory bail vide order dated 10.0