Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

VIKAS KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 10922/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIKAS KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 CRM-M-10922-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.05.2026 VIKAS KUMAR ..... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ..... RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Nitin Goswami, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG Haryana. Ms. Apoorv Garg, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral) This petition for pre-arrest bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner(s) under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.381 dated 18.09.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 109(1), 115, 118(1), 118(2), 190, 191(3), 251(3) and 61 of (erstwhile 307, 321, 324, 326, 149, 148, 507 and 120-B of IPC), Police Station Pundri, District Kaithal. 2. Vide order dated 24.03.2026 the petitioner(s) was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bail/surety VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.05.18 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner(s) shall jo