Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

VIKAS HARISH @ VICKY vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 19199/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIKAS HARISH @ VICKY
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-19199-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 CRM-M-19199-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:04.05.2026 Vikas Harish @ Vicky ... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sharma, AAG, Punjab. ... Manisha Batra, J. (Oral). 1. The instant one is the third petition for grant of regular bail as filed by the petitioner in case arising out of FIR No.103, dated 13.08.2024, registered under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act, at Police Station Dugri, District Ludhiana. The first petition as filed by him bearing CRM-M- 50778-2024 had been dismissed on 24.02.2025 whereas the second petition bearing CRM-M-70283-2025 had been dismissed on 16.02.2026. 2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that after dismissal of his previous petition, there is a change in the circumstances as co-accused, Sandeep Singh, Savita Garg Deepak Garg and Rahul Hans @ Rahul have been extended benefit of regular bail. On parity, he too deserves to be extended the same benefit. Each day spent by him in HARJEET KAUR 2026.05.05 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and