Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

VIJENDER AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

Citation / case number
RFA 69/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIJENDER AND ORS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

243 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA No. 69 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 Vijender and others ...Appellants Versus State of Haryana and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. (Dr.) Navin Kumar Gautam, Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Gautam, Advocate for the appellants-landowners. Mr. Abhinash Jain, Additional Advocate General, Hayana for respondent No. 1. Mr. Pardeep Rajput, Sr. Panel Counsel, UOI for respondent No. 2. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM No. 197-CI of 2025 Notice of the instant applications re:condonation of delay of 3387 days in filing the appeal was issued on 09.12.2025. In response, today learned counsel for respondent No. 2 has filed reply dated 22.05.2026, which is taken on record. Learned counsel(s) for the respondent(s) vehemently oppose the prayer made in the application. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the application. Concededly, the other similarly situated landowners pertaining to the same acquisition proceedings have already been held entitled for the enhanced amount of compensation pertaining to DINESH KUMAR 2026.06.01 12:46 I attest to th