VIJAY vs STATE OF HARYANA

216 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM-M-16097-2026 Date of Decision : 06.05.2026 Vijay ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana. None for the complainant. -.- Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.91 dated 02.03.2026, registered under Section 115, 118(1), 190, 191(3) and 351(2) of BNS (Section 118(2) of BNS added later on) at Sadar Yamuna Nagar, District Yamuna Nagar. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions, has apprised the Court that the petitioner is already in custody 3. In view of the submission made by the learned State counsel, the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, is/are also disposed of. May 06, 2025 (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.05.08 12:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document