Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-29

VIJAY @ VIJAY KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 31630/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIJAY @ VIJAY KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-31630-2026 -1- 108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31630-2026 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 Vijay @ Vijay Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Dr. Parminder Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.K.D.Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab. Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. 1. This is the third petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.94 dated 17.05.2024, registered under Section 18 of NDPS Act, 1985 (Section 29 of the NDPS Act added lateron), at Police Station City-2, Khanna, District Ludhiana. 2. The petitioner earlier approached this Court by of filing CRM- M-31566-2024 and CRM-M-27722-2025, which were dismissed on merits/dismissed vide orders dated 04.09.2024 and 27.05.2025, respectively. Now the petitioner has filed third petition for grant of anticipatory bail after a gap of about 01 year and there is no change in the circumstances in the present case. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any material change in facts or circumstances arising subsequent to the dismissal of the earlier petition. 3. It is well settled that a successive