Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-15

VIJAY SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 26619/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIJAY SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-26619-2026 -1- (209) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26619-2026 Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 VIJAY SINGH ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. D.N. Ganeriwala, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The prayer in this 2nd petition under Section 483 BNSS is for the grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No.586 dated 06.11.2025 registered under Sections 7 & 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 61(2), 308(6), 199(3) of BNS, 2023 (Sections 120B, 388, 166A(b) of IPC) at Police Station Civil Lines, Sirsa. 2. As per the prosecution case, one Seema Rani @ Simran Kaur daughter of Sukha Singh (subsequently nominated as an accused) levelled allegations against Pawan Bansal for committing rape upon her. The complaint was made to Sub-Inspector Jagdish Chander (granted bail vide order dated 07.05.2026 passed in CRM-M-17208-2026) who is alleged to have pressurized Pawan Bansal to effect a settlement and thereby received JITESH LAL 2026.05.15 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M