VIJAY SEHGAL vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH MR SANJEEV KUMAR ASSIT ENGINEER BLDG

Judgment text excerpt

$~117 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026 and CM APPL.32328/2026 VIJAY SEHGAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satvik Tiparti, Ms. Jyoti Singh, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH MR SANJEEV KUMAR ASSIT ENGINEER BLDG .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Adv. for MCD Mr. Vikash Chopra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.32327/2026 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 14.05.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 6385/2025. The operative directions therein are as under:- Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026 Page 1 of 3 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 10:19:43 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) who appears on advance notice, submits that the petitioner’s application for de-sealing of the property is under consideration. He submits that the MCD is also required to verify and examine the sanctioned building plan in respect of the property in question and compare the same with the existing construction presently standing at the property. 5. He further submits that if no impediment is found upon conclusion of the aforesaid exercise currently being undertaken by the MCD, the petitioner’s Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026 Page 2 of 3 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 10:19:43 application will be duly considered and an appropriate order shall be passed under intimation to the petitioner. 6. In the circumstances, no furthe