VIJAY LAKSHMI vs SANTOSH RANI

236 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A-386-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.05.2026 VIJAY LAKSHMI ...Applicant Versus SANTOSH RANI …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present : Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate for the applicant. ANOOP CHITKARA, J. CRM-8164-2020 This is an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C for substituting the deceased complainant Ghansham Dass with Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi, in the present appeal. For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed and complainant-Ghansham Dass is ordered to be substituted with Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi, in the present appeal. CRM-A-386-2020 Criminal COMI/215/216 Complaint Date of decision: 19.12.2019 Feeling aggrieved by the trial court's judgment, acquitting the accused/respondent, the complainant had come up before this Court by filing the above-mentioned application for leave to appeal. GURPREET KAUR 2026.05.21 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-A-386-2020 (O&M) -2- 2. Counsel for the applicant prays for transfer of appeal to the first Appellate Court in view of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in “Celestium Finan