VIJAY KUMAR GARG vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANRS

2026:PHHC:072100 ee IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.5034 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: .08.05.2026. Vijay Kumar Garg ...Petitioner VS Union of India through Chief Engineer, Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: None for the petitioner. se kako VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner despite the case having been called twice. 2. As noticed on the last date of hearing, even preliminary arguments have not been addressed despite the revision petition pending since 2018. 3. Though notice of motion has not been issued, Mr.Vinish Singla, Advocate had caused appearance on first call and had submitted that execution proceedings are being adjourned on account of the pendency of the present revision petition. 4. Since no one has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner despite the case having been called twice, it appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the present petition. That being so, this Court is choiceless but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. 5. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand dispos