Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-14

VIJAY KAPOOR vs STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 100/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIJAY KAPOOR
Respondent
STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

114-1 CWP-100-2026 1 2026:PHHC:076148-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-100-2026 Date of decision:-14.05.2026 Vijay Kapoor and others ...Petitioners Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present :- Mr. Gourave Bhayyiya Gilhotra, Advocate, Mr. Akash Manocha, Advocate and Mr. Vishawjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Himanshu Arora, Addl. Standing Counsel, U.T. Chandigarh with Mr. Sachit Singla, Advocate for respondents - U.T. Chandigarh. 2k 2s 2k SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. For orders, see order of even date passed in CWP-37036- 2025 titled “Mohit Aggarwal and another Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others”. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (VIKAS SURD 14.05.2026 JUDGE Brij Whether speaking/reasoned —: Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No