Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-25

VIDYA DHAKA vs STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Citation / case number
CWP 5197/2002
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VIDYA DHAKA
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 CWP-5197-2002 (O&M) Date of decision: May 25, 2026 VIDYA DHAKA ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Karanjeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Amar Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Aditya Gautam, Advocate, Ms. Hansika Bakshi, Advocate and Mr. Bhavdeep Modi, Advocate for respondent no.3. Mr. R.K. Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Dhull, Advocate and Mr. D.S. Maan, Advocate for respondent no.4. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of quo-warranto against the fourth respondent, who was appointed as Principal, Government Senior Secondary School. 2. Learned State counsel has received instructions from the Department vide memo dated 25.05.2026, which is retained on the case file as Annexure ‘A’. Referring to the same, he submits that the fourth respondent has retired from service as Joint Director about seven years back, on 30.11.2019. 3. In view thereof, the petition has been rendered infructuous and stands disposed of as such. May 25,