Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

VICKY SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 25508/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VICKY SHARMA AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-25508-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 232 CRM-M-25508-2026 Date of decision: 12.05.2026 VICKY SHARMA AND ANOTHER ......PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ..... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Lakhwinder Singh Dandiwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, Punjab. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. 1. This petition for bail is the first petition, filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. This petition has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.241 dated 10.10.2023 for the commission of offence punishable under Section 174-A of Indian Penal Code, Police Station City-2, District Mansa. 2. In nut-shell the facts emerging from record are that the petitioners, who were facing a trial for the commission of offence punishable under Punjab Excise Act were given the benefit of bail, but later on they failed to appear before the Court, and therefore, firstly their bail was cancelled ,and thereafter, they were declared proclaimed person vide order dated 15.09.2023. VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.13 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this doc