VICKY HARI BABU & ORS. vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1595/2026 VICKY HARI BABU & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Chetan and Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) for the State CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 322/2016 of Police Station Harsh Vihar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground that the respondent no. 2 (complainant de facto) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. State has no objection to this petition. W.P.(CRL) 1595/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.05.18 05:27:50 +05'30' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:18.05.2026 17:46:45 3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/SI Rahul Ranjan of PS Harsh Vihar. 4. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. It is stated by respondent no.2 that since the year 2017, she is living with the petitioners happily and has no complaint against any of them. It is also stated by her that two children were born from her wedlock with petitioner no. 1 and both of them are living with them. Under these circumstances, respondent no.2 submits that she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners. 5. Having sp