Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

madras High Court · 2026-05-29

Veeramani vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.

Court
madras High Court
Petitioner
Veeramani
Respondent
The State of Tamilnadu, Rep.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Crl.A(MD)No.579 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.06.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.A(MD)No.579 of 2026 Veeramani ... Appellant Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Sub-Division, Dindigul District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District. [Crime No.292 of 2026] 3.Baby ... Respondents Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 14 - A (2) of the SC/ST (POA) Act to set aside the order of the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Dindigul in CrlMP(MD)No.102 of 2026 dated 15.05.2026 and allow this appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Balaji For Respondent : Mr.V.Shathurthi Raja Nos.1 and 2 Government Counsel For Respondent : No appearance No.3 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/06/2026 05:55:02 pm ) Crl.A(MD)No.579 of 2026 ORDER The appellant, a police constable working, in the battalion has been arrested on the complaint of 3rd respondent police officer, who is working in the same battalion. The allegation as against the appellant is that this appellant has promised the 3rd respondent that he would marry, had physical

Veeramani vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. · Niyam