Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

VEER CHAND vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 23034/2019
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VEER CHAND
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-23034-2019 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.211 CWP-23034-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.05.2026 Veer Chand ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amarpreet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. ***** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J.(Oral) 1 In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 16.05.2019 (Annexure P-5), vide which, the claim of the petitioner for grant of interest on account of delayed payment of retiral benefits i.e. gratuity and leave encashment has been rejected. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Constable in the year 1975 with the Punjab Police. Thereafter, the petitioner was promoted on various posts from time to time. Ultimately, the petitioner retired from the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police (Intelligence) on 31.05.2017 after getting extension of 02 years. The gratuity was sanctioned on 05.07.2017 and RAMANDEEP SINGH 2026.05.20 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-23034-2019 (O&M) 2