Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

VED PARKASH SHARMA vs ANURAG RASTOGI AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
COCP 798/2022
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
VED PARKASH SHARMA
Respondent
ANURAG RASTOGI AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

227 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-798-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.05.2026 Ved Parkash Sharma ......Petitioner Vs. Anurag Rastogi and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Sandeep Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 02.04.2019 passed by this Court in CWP-473-2019. 2. In compliance of the order dated 02.04.2019 passed by this Court in CWP-473-2019, additional affidavit dated 18.05.2026 of Anil Kumar Dahiya, Engineer-in-Chief (Buildings/HOD), Haryana, Public Works (B&R) Department, Chandigarh, along with Annexures R-1 to R-3, has been filed on behalf of the respondents in the Court. The same is taken on record. A copy of the same has been given to learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, submits that order dated 02.04.2019 passed by this Court in CWP- 473-2019 has been complied with. VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.21 19:06 I attest to the accurac