VANSHAJ SAINI vs STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP-16352-2026 1 112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16352-2026 Date of decision : 22.05.2026 Vanshaj Saini ...Petitioner Vs. State Election Commission, Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Rhythm Katyal, Advocate for the petitioner. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the election of the private respondent No.4 was based upon the fraud, which factual position has been brought to the notice of the State already, but no action is being taken which is causing prejudice as, he is not eligible to continue to be the counsellor of the Municipal Corporation, Rohtak. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appropriate direction be given to the respondents. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Ms. Anu Pal, Addl. A.G. Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and submits that in case, any representation has been made by the petitioner already on the issue concerned and is still pending consideration with respondent No.1-State Election Commission, Haryana, then appropriate decision on the same will be take