UT CHANDIGARH vs SHYAM ALIAS SAM

210 CRM-A-1622-2025 UT CHANDIGARH V/S SHYAM ALIAS SAM Present: Mr. Rajiv Vij, Addl. P.P. for U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Manjot Singh Gujral, Advocate, for the respondent. ***** Counsel for the applicant(s) submits that they have a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for conviction of private respondents. Counsel appearing for the private respondent submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned. Leave to appeal granted. Registry to assign number to appeal. Main Case. Heard. Admitted. The accused, to execute a bond for attendance within two months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed. Given above, the accused shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepting the sureties, the concerned Court must satisfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the accused before the Court. The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all stipulations, terms, and c