URMILA DEVI vs KULDEEP VERMA AND ORS.

117/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-4354-2017 (O&M) Reserved on 09.02.2026 Pronounced on : 07.05.2026 Uploaded on : 08.05.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes Urmila Devi ….Appellant Versus Kuldeep Verma & ors. ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN ***** Present:- Mr. Ashwani Kumar Chopra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Brahamjot Singh Nahar, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Inderjit Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.3. Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Shubreet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.4 (UT). *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. 1 Plaintiff is in second appeal. For convenience, parties hereinafter are referred to by their original position in the suit, i.e. the appellant as plaintiff and respondents as defendants. POOJA SHARMA 2026.05.08 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 This is an unfortunate dispute between mother and son. They are disputing over the ownership of a residential property bearing House No.3097, Sector 37-D, Chandigarh. Mother filed suit seeking decree of declaration to the effect that