Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

URMILA AND ANOTHER vs RAVINDER AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
FAO 537/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
URMILA AND ANOTHER
Respondent
RAVINDER AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

FAO-537-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (126) FAO-537-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:- 22.05.2026 Urmila and another ...Appellants Versus Ravinder and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) CM-2310-CII-2026 1. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 283 in filing the present appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 283 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. FAO-537-2026 1. Parents of the deceased-Vinit Kumar have filed the present appeal for enhancement of compensation. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Narnaul, vide award dated 17.02.2025 had awarded compensation of Rs.28,61,672/- along with interest on account of death of Vinit Kumar, which took place in a motor vehicular accident. The only issue which arises for NARESH KUMAR 2026.05.22 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement FAO-537-2026 (O&M) -2- consideration in the present appeal