UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS vs CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS

CWP-14295-2026 1 115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14295-2026 Date of decision : 11.05.2026 Union Territory Chandigarh and others ...Petitioners Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek K.Premi, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Kriti Avasthi, Advocate and Mr. Nikhil Goyal, Advocate for the respondents. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging an interim order dated 06.02.2026 (Annexure P-21), by which the respondents herein and who are applicant before the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’), have been allowed to continue in service during the pendency of the original application. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners will be satisfied in case, at this stage, the litigation initiated at the hands of the respondents-applicant is decided at the earliest so that, the Chandigarh Administration is apprised, as to VANITA 2026.05.13 10:28 I attest to the acc