Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Bombay High Court · 2026-05-05

UNION OF INDIA vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority

Citation / case number
IAL/2186/2026
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA
Respondent
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority

Judgment text excerpt

WPL-36387-25.DOC 2026:BHC-OS:11560-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L.) NO. 36387 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L.) NO. 2186 OF 2026 Techno Freshworld LLP, ) A Limited Liability Partnership )...Petitioner Vs 1. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development ) Authority ) 2. Executive Engineer, Building Permission, MHADA ) 3. Union of India, Ministry of Defence through ) (a) The Flag Officer, Commanding-in-Chief ) Western Naval Command. ) (b) The Commander, Executive Officer, ) INS Trata ) 4. Prabhadevi Indraprastha Co-op. Housing ) Society Ltd. )...Respondents _________ Mr. Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohan Kadam, Mr. Sanjay Udeshi, Mr. Aditya Udeshi and Mr. Rahul Sanghavi i/b. M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for Petitioner. Mr. P. G. Lad with Ms. Sayali Apte, Mr. Murlidharan Kalathil for Respondent Nos.1 & 2/MHADA. Mr. Rajshekar Govilkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Krishnakant Deshmukh and Ms. Shaba Khan for Respondent No.3. Mr. Rohaan Cama with Mr. Shishir Joshi and Ms. Priti Shukla i/b. Ms. Priti Joshi for Respondent No.4. Cdr. Himanshu Sharma, INS Trata, Cdr. Archit Thorat, HQWNC and Cdr. Aditya Deep Singh, HQWNC Officers are present in Court. __________ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ. RESERVED ON : 28 JANUARY 2026. PRONOUNCED ON : 5 MAY, 2026 ____________ Page 1 of 95 P. V. Rane WPL-36387-25.DOC JUDGMENT (Per G. S. Kulkarni, J.). 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India again brings to the fore and resurrects the issue on a mandatory ‘NOC’ to be obtained from the Naval Authorities (INS Trata, Worli), in the present case in regard to construction of two buildings. The first building is a completed construction which would rehabilitate 72 members of respondent No.4-society.

UNION OF INDIA vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority · Niyam