UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS vs RAMESH CHAND AND OTHERS

CWP-16361-2026 1 113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16361-2026 Date of decision : 22.05.2026 Union of India and others ...Petitioner Vs. Ramesh Chand and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Ms. Bhavana Datta, Advocate for the petitioners. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the benefit has been granted by the Tribunal to the respondents based upon the judgment passed in OA-3204-2011 titled as “Madhu Sudan and others Vs. Union of India and others”, which is incorrectly granted. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the petitioners never raised any grievance and therefore, now allowing the benefit of the judgment in Madhu Sudan (supra) is incorrect. 3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the record with her able assistance. 4. As per settled principle of law, once the question of law has been settled, the same should apply on all, rather than forcing every one to approach the Court to claim the same. A bare reading of the order passed by Hon’ble Central Administrative Trib