Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-20

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS vs RAHUL MOUDGIL AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 15797/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Respondent
RAHUL MOUDGIL AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15797-2026 Date of Decision : 20.05.2026 Union of India and others ........Petitioners VERSUS Rahul Moudgil and another ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners-UOI. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. In the present petition, the challenge is to the impugned order dated 12.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2 – Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal), in OA No.060/771 of 2024, whereby the Original Application was allowed and the transfer order dated 04.07.2024 was quashed and set aside and applicant-respondent No.1 was also allowed to continue at his substantive place of posting at Mohali. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners-UOI submits that though the impugned order passed by the Tribunal allowing respondent No.1 to work from his substantive place of posting i.e., Mohali has been implemented however, no further liberty has been granted, henceforth, in the event of a routine transfer, respondent No.1 may be transferred by the petitioners-UO