Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-06

UMESH KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 2387/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
UMESH KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHER
Respondent
STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 270 CRM-M-2387-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 06.05.2026 Umesh Kumar Yadav and another ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of U.T. Chandigarh and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Vinay Yadav and Mr. Bharat Bhandari, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. DhruvDayal, Addl. P.P. for U.T. Chandigarh. Mr. Nitish Kumar, Advocate for respondentNo.2. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of FIR No.233 dated 18.12.2014 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Sector 19, Chandigarh along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 07.01.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. The aforesaid FIR was registered on the statement of D.C. Jain, resident of House No.182, Sector 19-A, Chandigarh, relevant part of which is extracted as under:- “1. That in the month of July 2012 the above-mentioned persons, out of which Abhishek Arora is a property dealer, met me at my residence and allured me to purchase a plot of 1260 Sq yds.