Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

UMED vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 23880/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
UMED
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-23880-2026 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (211) CRM-M-23880-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 21.05.2026 Umed …... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Rani, AAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 BNSS (Section 438 Cr.P.C.) is for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.218 dated 03.04.2026 under Sections 308(2), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS (old Sections 384, 506, 34 IPC) registered at Police Station Gurgaon Sadar, District Gurugram, Haryana. 2. The present FIR came to be registered at the instance of Ranjit Kumar Mahato and reads as under:- Copy of application To Incharge Police Post Jhadsa District Gurugram Subject Sonu, Nitin, Himanshu and their companions to collect money illegally by showing fear of killing Sir, I am a Ranjit Kumar Mahato son of Jagarnath Mahato resident of Village Barwa Police Station Eichak District Hazaribagh Jharkhand. At present, I am living on rent from village Jharsa for the last 7-8 years. I have opened a beedi SU