UMED SINGH vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS

CWP-8242-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (210) CWP-8242-2026 Date of Decision : 07.05.2026 Umed Singh …Petitioner Versus The District Magistrate-cum-Appellate Tribunal and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Lakshya Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Vide instant writ petition, as cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the order dated 13.03.2025 (Annexure P-13), passed by learned Maintenance Tribunal cum Sub Divisional Magistrate, Rohtak, and order dated 19.12.2025 (Annexure P-15), passed by learned District Magistrate-cum-Appellate Tribunal, Rohtak. 2. In brief, the petitioner-senior citizen instituted an appeal, under Section 16 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2007”) before the learned Appellate Tribunal, Rohtak.. However, upon consideration of the matter in issue, the MANPREET SINGH 2026.05.20 10:26 l