Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

UMED SINGH AND ANR vs ANURAG RASTOGI AND ORS.

Citation / case number
COCP 1165/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
UMED SINGH AND ANR
Respondent
ANURAG RASTOGI AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

COCP-1165-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 121 COCP-1165-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 21, 2026 Umed Singh & anr. ......Petitioners Vs. Anurag Rastogi and ors. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr.Ankur Dua, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for Mr. H.S. Gill, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of order dated 17.03.2025 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP-6511-2023 as well as order dated 21.11.2017 passed in CWP No. 1072-2008. The relevant portion of order dated 21.11.2025 reads as under: “Apparently nothing has been done till date, though more than two years have expired. Any acquisition of land is at State expenses using public money. The officers of the State are bound to protect it. It is expected that exercise shall now be carried out on war footing to complete the process to save the government properties from being encroached upon and further discouraging unscrupulous litigants to take benefit of wrong entries in the record. It shall be the dut