UMAR TRADERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Sr. No.126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16728-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.05.2026 Umar Traders …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. (through video conferencing) Ms. Shruti AAG, Punjab. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Through this petition, the petitioner seeks a copy of the order through which the petitioner’s goods were intercepted and penalty under Section 130 of the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was imposed. 2. Learned State counsel submits that copy of the afore order had already been supplied to the petitioner and another copy has been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today. 3. Though learned counsel for the petitioner disputes receipt of the copy of the order prior to today, he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to take up this issue in appeal. 4. Disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE May 26, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VANDANA 2026.05.27 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and i