UMAR MOHAMMAD @ UMAR MOHD vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

2026:PHHC:084788 Eevee ak soeeale 144 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17203-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 27.05.2026 UMAR MOHAMMAD @ UMAR MOHD ..«.PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Karan Ranjha, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG, Haryana. sok SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to resume/rejoin duties on the post of Ayurvedic Pharmacist with a further direction to be issued to the respondents to treat the non-duty period of the petitioner as continuous service without any break and grant all consequential benefits. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.4 to consider the representation dated 05.02.2025 (Annexure P-9) within a time bound manner. ANURADHA 2026.05.30 00:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-17203-2026 (O&M) 2 3. Notice of motion. 4, Ms. Mayuri L