TWINKLE AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 173 CRWP-5848-2026 Date of decision: 18.05.2026 TWINKLE AND ANOTHER ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Ms. Dimple Rani, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Kumar Kachura, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior DAG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Twinkle and Navdeep Singh have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their lives and personal liberty from private respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are major and are staying together in a live-in relationship. However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated 11.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka. The petitioners VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.19 10:09 I attest to the accurac