TUHI RAM vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13457-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 04.05.2026 Tuhi Ram ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana & Ors ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 – Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak Camp, District Sonipat – to decide the application for stay expeditiously, which has been pending since May 2025, and till such time as the application for stay is decided, the dispossession of the petitioner be stayed. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4/State. Learned State counsel is not in a position to deny the fact that the application for stay has been pending since May 2025. 4. In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No.2 – Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak Camp, District Sonipat – to decide the applic