TRIPAT JIT SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP-9161-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CWP-9161-2026 Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 Tripat Jit Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ishan Kaushal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Additional Solicitor General of India (through video conferencing) with Ms. Neha Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India-respondent No.2 Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate, Ms. Monika Thatai Advocate, Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.6 & 7 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent Nos.6 and 7 to de-freeze his bank account maintained with respondent No.7- HDFC Bank Limited. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent-bank has frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the bank has acted upon directions of Law Enforcement Agencies. He is not involved in any criminal activity. He is not named in any FIR relat