Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-08

TRIDENT LIMITED vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CWP 13613/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
TRIDENT LIMITED
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13613-2026 (O&M) Trident Limited … Petitioner Versus State of Punjab & another … Respondents Reserved on : 4th May, 2026 Pronounced on : 8th May, 2026 Uploaded on : 8th May, 2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: full judgment. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Argued by: Ms. Munisha Gandhi, Senior Advocate (arguing counsel) with Mr. Viraj Gandhi and Mr. Adarsh K. Dubey, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Maninderjit S. Bedi, Advocate General Punjab (arguing counsel) with Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Sr. Dy. Advocate General Punjab and Ms. Kavita Joshi, Advocate for the respondent/State. Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Senior Advocate (arguing counsel) with Mr. A.S. Chadha, Advocate for respondent No.2/PPCB. SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE CM-7409-2026 In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed, as prayed for, and the documents (Annexures P-11 to P-16) are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. CWP-13613-2026 1. This petition invoking writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution