TINKU KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.227 CWP-8915-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.05.2026 Tinku Kumar ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: Mr. Eklavya Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. ***** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J. (Oral) 1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 08.01.2021 (Annexure P-4), whereby the petitioner has been discharged from service. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioner has expired and as such, the present petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the abovesaid submission, the present writ petition is disposed of as rendered infructuous. 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE 26.05.2026 Ramandeep Singh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAMANDEEP SINGH 2026.05.26 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document