TILAK RAJ vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 248 CRM-M-51843-2024(O&M) Date of decision: 25.05.2026 Tilak Raj ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS State of Haryana and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Raghav Bali and Mr. Sikander Mehta, Advocates for Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Onkar Singh Wahla, Sr. DAG, Haryana with ASI Jaipal, P.S. Pundri. Mr. Shivam Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed challenging the condition of bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 17.11.2022 passed by this Court in CRM-M-13319-2021. 2. On 27.11.2024, the petitioner was directed to deposit the cost of Rs.2,00,000/- within a period of 04 weeks, in terms of the undertaking given by him and on such contingency, the operation of impugned order dated 20.03.2023 was directed to be stayed. 3. Learned State Counsel on instructions from ASI Jaipal, Police Station Pundri, contends that the petitioner has neither appeared before the Trial Court nor deposited the cost as per his undertaking given before this Court and that he has also been declared as a proclaimed pers