Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-05-13

THE COMMISSIONER MCD AND ORS vs RAJINDER PARSHAD SHARMA AND ORS

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-4178/2011 2026:DHC:4188-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
THE COMMISSIONER MCD AND ORS
Respondent
RAJINDER PARSHAD SHARMA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 29.01.2026 Judgment delivered on: 13.05.2026 Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~ + W.P.(C) 4178/2011 THE COMMISSIONER MCD AND ORS .....Petitioners versus RAJINDER PARSHAD SHARMA AND ORS .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioners : Mr. Tushar Sannu, Mr. Fajallu Rehman, Advs. For the Respondents : Mr. Raghuvansh Mishra and Mr. Shivanshu Bhardwaj, Advs/applicant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. CM APPL.21815/2022 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. 2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 54745/2018 3. The REVIEW PET. 473/2018 has been filed by the respondents Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRADEEP WP(C) No.4178/2011 Page 1 of 8 SHARMA Signing Date:13.05.2026 15:06:40 seeking review of the order dated 07.05.2013 passed by this Court, whereby it has allowed the writ petition filed by the petitioners challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Tribunal) in Original Application (OA) No.1131/2010,wherein the Tribunal has directed the petitioners i.e. MCD to pay difference in wages to the respondent of the post of Superintendent w.e.f. 18.05.2005 by relying upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Selveraj v. Lt. Governor of Islands, Portblair & Ors., (1998) 4 SCC 291. 4. We find that this review petition has been filed in the year 2018 with a delay of 1665 days. A reference is made to the order passed by the Supreme Court in a SLP filed by respondent/Rajinder Prashad Sharma dated 07.05.2013 wherein the following has been stated:- “After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for petitioner sought permissio

THE COMMISSIONER MCD AND ORS vs RAJINDER PARSHAD SHARMA AND ORS · Niyam