TEK RAM vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 224 CRM-M No.27641 of 2026 Date of Decision: 20.05.2026 Tek Ram ... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Lathwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana, for the respondent-State. *** MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking regular bail in the FIR mentioned below:- FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 498 20.12.2025 Gannaur, District 20 (b) (ii) (C) of Narcotic Sonipat (Haryana) Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’) (29 of NDPS Act added later on) 2. As per the allegations, on 20.12.2025, on the basis of a secret information to the effect that accused Ravi @ Baga accompanied by his accomplices was carrying charas with him and was going to pass through MANJU 2026.05.21 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order /judgment Chandigarh CRM-M No.27641 of 2026 -2- the area of Village Haldana, Panipat and to go towards Gannaur in a Wagon- R car bearing r