TEEJA DEVI vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15153-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 TEEJA DEVI ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of orders dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P-12), 10.09.2025 (Annexure P-17) as well as communication dated 25.04.2025 (Annexure P-15) whereby respondents have rejected her claim for compensation. She is further seeking compensation amounting to Rs.5 lakh under Mukhya Mantri Kisan Evam Khetehar Majdoor Jiwan GURPREET KAUR Suraksha Yojna, 2013 (for short ‘2013 Yojana’). She is also seeking setting 2026.05.15 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15153-2026 (O&M) -2- aside of order (Annexure P-23) whereby respondent has rejected her claim under DAYALU scheme on the ground of delay. 2. The petitioner is a homemaker who along wit